pinproof
Early access · not built yet

Catch the datasheet violations your DRC can't see.

Pinproof reads your schematic and the datasheets for every part on it, then flags what breaks — wrong voltage ratings, reversed polarity, missing decoupling — before you send boards to fab. KiCad and Altium.

example review · buck regulator net C1 10V REG1 C4 16V ⚠ C4 rated 16V REG1 output is 24V ✓ R2 pin-compat
How it works
01

Upload schematic + datasheets

Export your netlist (.kicad_sch or an Altium export) and attach the PDF datasheets for the parts you're unsure about.

02

Pinproof reads both

It extracts the limits straight from each datasheet and walks your netlist net by net — no pre-built rule library to maintain or trust blindly.

03

Plain-English report

Every finding names the net, the pin, and the datasheet line it came from — so you can check it yourself in ten seconds.

Voltage / current ratings Polarity & pinout Missing decoupling Pin-to-pin compatibility Footprint sanity

The honest part

This doesn't exist yet — there's no working tool behind this page, and no company behind it either, just one person checking whether it's worth building. A tool for this exact problem already ships commercially — Traceformer, from $20/mo per seat — which is the actual reason this is worth testing: the problem is real enough that someone already charges for it.

Pinproof's bet is different: instead of a pre-built rule library, the AI reads the datasheets you give it, for your parts, every time. Whether that's accurate and useful enough in practice is exactly what isn't verified yet.

Why not just paste this into ChatGPT or Claude yourself?

Honestly — you can, and for a one-off check that might be enough. Here's where Pinproof actually earns its keep, concretely:

No manual export. Pinproof runs KiCad's own netlist exporter for you — every net, every pin, every footprint and LCSC reference — instead of you hand-copying values or screenshotting the schematic into a chat window.

A reviewer's checklist, not a blank chat. The prompt enforces one discipline most ad-hoc chats don't: cite the exact net, pin, and datasheet line for every claim, or say "can't verify" — never guess a voltage limit. Writing that into every conversation yourself, every time, gets old fast.

The context stays loaded. Upload once, then ask follow-ups — "what about C4", "check the whole analog rail" — without re-pasting datasheets each time or losing earlier context.

If you'd rather paste things into Claude yourself and write your own prompt, you probably don't need this product — and that's a fair call.

Try it

It's live. Try it on a real schematic.

No manual review here — run it yourself. Start with 3 free reviews, no card needed. If it's useful, a one-time pack or a monthly subscription both work out far cheaper than the time a missed decoupling cap costs you at fab time.

Free
$0

3 reviews, no card required.

Start free →
Credits pack
$5/ 20 reviews

One-time, never expires. Good for the occasional board.

Subscription
$9/ month, 50 reviews

For a project you're iterating on regularly.

Payments are in Stripe test mode while early terms get sorted out — use card number 4242 4242 4242 4242, any future date, any CVC. No real charge happens yet.